Monday, April 21, 2008

Took Std Test Wednesday When Should I Get Results



Wall Street, Granada, Spain

I had not thought in mind until I heard the comments of Miguel Angel Granados Chapa in UNAM Radio this morning. Therefore, what follows is developing what he said ... however, worth pondering.

Flavio Sosa, director of the APPO in Oaxaca, was released from prison this weekend. The joy that this news means for the Oaxacan movement is contrasted with a rather daunting fact: was released because they can not support all criminal charges be brought against him. One of those charges was for the kidnapping of two police Ministerial Police of Oaxaca who had forcibly entered the home of Flavio Sosa, and then detained by municipal police in their community, even for the same aggravated. I thought the kidnapping charge would have been charged with making government departments, which would deprive the freedom to officials who worked in those units. However, what is intended to argue is that these policemen allegedly abducted in her own home ministry.

Well, well, pretend that yes he was charged with one count of kidnapping for taking such office (a common practice of some social movements). Is it a real kidnapping? Well, I consulted the Federal Penal Code, as Granados Chapa said that as it is established, the crime of kidnapping does not apply to the actions of Flavio Sosa. Well, the articles 364 to 366 (with encores and addenda) provide the types of deprivation of liberty and when to prosecute those who perform. As I mentioned Granados Chapa, albeit somewhat incomplete, kidnapping is the deprivation of liberty of a person for purposes of profit to the abductor or the purpose of the authority or an individual acting or refraining from making any act. However, in the latter case, the abductor must have threatened the hostages with the deprivation of life or harm (Book 2, art. 366 Federal Penal Code), for a response to the demands that were made to the authority.

We then Flavio Sosa was accused of a crime he did not commit. But the reality is that he was accused of several crimes he did not commit. Ie: he issued formal arrest unconstitutionality (as it had not been reviewed any of the crimes), and not content with that, he was held prisoner for a year and a half ... for nothing.

Such impunity is the same impunity that allows big business, do not pay taxes (also unconstitutional), and several other atrocities committed by the federal government, all we know.

0 comments:

Post a Comment