Thursday, February 28, 2008

Ikusa Otome Suvia Wiki

FICCO Reluctance to give up ...


"Sean always able to feel, in the depths, any injustice done against anyone, the world. It is the most beautiful quality of a revolutionary. "



This fragment was part of a letter Che wrote to his children, several years ago.

I think the problem is not lack of empathy. We do not believe then only need to feel the pain of others and outraged by the injustices suffered. That hurt and indignant and every day, all. No wonder a consequence of the evolution of our sociality is the great capacity we have to put ourselves in the foot the other, ie the theory of mind.

But still, with the pain of the injustice done against anyone in tow, is not a reaction. It's almost as if you go to the cinema to see a fiction film: in the approx. 120 minutes is the movie, you feel fully identified with one or more characters and plot, so much so that you can mourn, be angry or laugh. And when you leave the cinema when the movie is over, becomes one with reality, to the passivity of heart and ideas.

What I think we do need, and we need a many-is a kind of resignation, is a special type of waiver, one that involves each of us away, to different degrees, of our "zones comfort. "

But we must remember that, like all committed activities of human beings, the possibility of waiving is also a decision process, and that decision is freedom. So honor the freedom that everyone has to make a decision, even when there are very few who practice it. Even when there are many, says Fromm, they fear to freedom, even when there are those who will carry the responsibility for fighting other groups, even when there are those who prefer to turn the eyes and heart before they see face to face to the other.

So I think one of the biggest tasks is in line to respect the freedom of others, just get into the task of personal transformation. And that will end with another quote from Che:

"Man must become at the same time production progresses, not conduct an adequate job if we were only producing items, raw materials and we were not at the same time producers of men. "

0 comments:

Post a Comment